HONDA CBF STUNNER VS TVS FLAME & COMPARISON


CBF STUNNER VS FLAME :

COMPARISON OF FEATURES :

CBF STUNNER :

  • An integrated body cowl and voluminous fuel tank.
  • Sporty split seat.
  • Tube les tyre in front as well as rear.
  • Sporty foot steps holder.
  • Hydraulic 240 mm front disc.
FLAME :
  • Analog speedometer and other clock,fuel guage mileage meter are embedded with digital display.
  • Delta edge exhaust.
  • Comes with front disc as optional.
  • Black alloy wheels.
  • New stylish tank.

COMPARISON OF PERFORMANCE :

CBF STUNNER :

The honda stunner with 125 cc delivers a power of 11 bhp @ 8000 rpm and 11 nm @ 6500 rpm.the honda engine is very smooth in its performance compare to flame even at higher speed.the gear shifting of stunner is very smooth,the engine builty quality is top class and the performance of engine at lower rpm also good. very smooth gear box feel comfortable riding in city.excellent breaking by front disc and rear drum and very good in handling.very good in its pick up so that it can reach 0-60 just in 5.2 sec this stunner is yet powerfull in its segment.the sporty looks attract the college student to buy.

FLAME:
The 124.8 cc engine delivers a power of 10.5 bhp @ 8250 rpm.it delivers less torque of 10 Nm @ 6500 rpm compare to stunner, and also less in its bhp.but it comes with a new technology of delta edge and also the engine incorporated with 3 valve technology. the flame lags in its power and in its performance compare to stunner.If you go for higher speed the tank fiber console will shake. in looks its good and also in technology  but when compare to stunner the engine quality not up to the mark. comfortable riding and hadling and good in breaking also.its gives very good mileage compare to stunner. and it comes with digital console but you wont get these digital console in stunner.

COMPARISON OF ADVANTAGES / MERITS :

CBF STUNNER :

  • Looks sporty in its segment
  • smooth engine.
  • comfortable ride and good handling.
  • excellent breaking.
FLAME:
  • Utility box mounted with tank.
  • Good mileage.
  • 3 valve technology.
  • Mileage indicator.

COMPARISON OF DISADVANTAGES / DEMERITS  :

CBF STUNNER :

  • Looks big but its 125 cc engine doesnt suit.
  • The front cowl shakes at higher speed.
  • They could  have introduced with digital speedo meter etc..
FLAME :
  • Lags in pick up.
  • Poor quality services.
  • The fiber shoulder mounted in tank shakes when throttle for more speed.

COMPARISON OF TECHNICAL SPECIFICATION:

SPEC CBF STUNNER FLAME
M F C HONDA TVS
C C 124.7 CC 124.8 CC
TORQUE 11 N-M@6000rpm 10 N-M@6500rpm
BHP 11 @8000rpm 10.5@8000rpm
GEAR 5 SPEED 4 SPEED
STARTER ELECTRIC /KICK ELECTRIC/KICK
WHEEL BASE 1271 MM 1320 MM
TYRE 100X80(alloy wh) 90 X 80(alloy wheel)
MILEAGE 55-60 65-70 KMPL
PRICE 54000 47000 ( EX SHOWROOM )
AT LAST : The honda CBF stunner is better than tvs FLAME. better go for CBF stunner

15 Comments

  • By Vivek Kumar Shah, January 29, 2009 @ 5:50 am

    Disadvantage of TVS Flame against CBF Stunner. KIndly explain me

  • By ravi, March 6, 2009 @ 4:41 am

    fucking tvs flame is like bully
    in front of cbf stunner

  • By deepu, April 9, 2009 @ 5:37 am

    flame is good all 125 bikes its my experiance not bad

  • By JJ, June 3, 2009 @ 10:08 am

    TVS flame is the best bike i have ever seen

  • By suranga, June 3, 2009 @ 10:11 am

    con’t compair with TVS Flame because of Flame No1

  • By yoo, December 5, 2009 @ 12:44 am

    stunner the best

  • By dany, March 27, 2010 @ 9:42 am

    TVS FLAME great mileage ,good pick up ….low maintainance

  • By Vaibhav gupta:), March 29, 2010 @ 12:08 pm

    FL@meeeee is the bike
    aag laga de logo ke dilo par
    stunner is not bed but its like a against the FLAMMMEEE!!!!
    YUPPPPPPPP GUYIESSS FLAME ROCKS :)
    &
    &
    &
    &
    &
    &
    STUUUUUNNEERRRRRRRRRRRR SIMPLY !!!

  • By sunny, March 29, 2010 @ 10:20 pm

    i have my own cbf. the front cowl doesn’t shakes at higher speed. it’s first mistake. digital speedo has a very little life time than manuals. those who want to spend less money to own a classy stylish bike, for them 125 cc suits. u guys r doing nothing but making a joke.

  • By arun, April 9, 2010 @ 7:33 am

    stunner rocks

  • By ANKUR, July 11, 2010 @ 7:01 am

    stuner is a good bike but FLAME is outstanding

  • By paramvir singh, August 22, 2010 @ 9:03 am

    stunner is best for stunting. it is good for racing in all 125cc bikes

  • By hardeep singh, August 22, 2010 @ 9:10 am

    stunner pgm fi is realy racing bike.its engine is 125cc but this bike is cross cbz extreme 150cc

  • By Arundas, September 6, 2010 @ 9:07 am

    Stunner the lord of streets…..Proved

  • By Alok Parekk, September 10, 2010 @ 2:20 am

    Stunner looks good but everything is not for looking. .05 difference in pickup No Matter.difference in 5Km in average takes matter. Flame much powerfull then stunner. give some load to bike then see which is better. Flame has better balance then stunner.
    So Flame is the exelent bike in it’s series.

Other Links to this Post

RSS feed for comments on this post. TrackBack URI

Leave a comment