Comments on: HONDA CBF STUNNER VS TVS FLAME & COMPARISON

By: Alok Parekk

Alok Parekk — Fri, 10 Sep 2010 09:20:29 +0000

Stunner looks good but everything is not for looking. .05 difference in pickup No Matter.difference in 5Km in average takes matter. Flame much powerfull then stunner. give some load to bike then see which is better. Flame has better balance then stunner.
So Flame is the exelent bike in it’s series.

By: Arundas

Arundas — Mon, 06 Sep 2010 16:07:36 +0000

Stunner the lord of streets…..Proved

By: hardeep singh

hardeep singh — Sun, 22 Aug 2010 16:10:22 +0000

stunner pgm fi is realy racing bike.its engine is 125cc but this bike is cross cbz extreme 150cc

By: paramvir singh

paramvir singh — Sun, 22 Aug 2010 16:03:05 +0000

stunner is best for stunting. it is good for racing in all 125cc bikes

By: ANKUR

ANKUR — Sun, 11 Jul 2010 14:01:04 +0000

stuner is a good bike but FLAME is outstanding

By: arun

arun — Fri, 09 Apr 2010 14:33:32 +0000

stunner rocks

By: sunny

sunny — Tue, 30 Mar 2010 05:20:37 +0000

i have my own cbf. the front cowl doesn’t shakes at higher speed. it’s first mistake. digital speedo has a very little life time than manuals. those who want to spend less money to own a classy stylish bike, for them 125 cc suits. u guys r doing nothing but making a joke.

By: Vaibhav gupta:)

Vaibhav gupta:) — Mon, 29 Mar 2010 19:08:14 +0000

FL@meeeee is the bike
aag laga de logo ke dilo par
stunner is not bed but its like a against the FLAMMMEEE!!!!
YUPPPPPPPP GUYIESSS FLAME ROCKS
&
&
&
&
&
&
STUUUUUNNEERRRRRRRRRRRR SIMPLY !!!

By: dany

dany — Sat, 27 Mar 2010 16:42:20 +0000

TVS FLAME great mileage ,good pick up ….low maintainance

By: yoo

yoo — Sat, 05 Dec 2009 07:44:03 +0000

stunner the best