Pulsar 150 vs Fazer 150


BAJAJ PULSAR 150 VS  YAMAHA FAZER 150

COMPARISON OF FEATURES :

PULSAR 150

  • Pulsar 150 cc comes with digital speed meter.
  • Neutral and turning indicator and with side stand indicator.
  • New razor sharp tail light.
  • The head light is with a city light gives better look.
  • Front disc.

FAZER 150

  • Aerodynamic front cowl and visor which protects the wind blast enhance the comfort long ride.
  • Its also mid-ship muffler which is introduced by Yamaha first time in India.
  • The front cowl mirror   not only look trendy but also better rear view.
  • As we know FZ series comes with a radial tyre first in India by 140/60 17 radial.
  • The front cowl comes with a new graphic and a Yamaha logo on it.
  • The mono suspension with a 7 steps adjustable for stable riding.
  • Fully digital display console with a Cristal display.
  • The sport stylish head light and a city light in between them gives excellent look.
  • The seating designed in such a way doesn’t feel fatigue on ride.

COMPARISON OF PERFORMANCE:

PULSAR 150

  • The new Pulsar 149.01 cc with a 14.09 bhp delivers good power
  • Gives good pick up gives more speed.
  • It rushes on road when you twist the throttle it feels josh to ride.
  • 0-60 in 5 sec,maximum speed of 113 kmph.
  • It develops a maximum torque 13.90 @ 6500 rpm.
  • Very good throttle response.
  • Good breaking but sensitive.
  • Digital twin spark ignition(DTSi) provides efficient combustion and better performance under all condition.
  • Great performance at lower rpm through advanced ExhausTEC Technology.

FAZER 150

  • The fazer come with 153 cc delivers a power of 14 ps @ 7500 rpm and a maximum torque of 14 Nm @ 6000 rpm.
  • The mid ship muffler placed in center in concentration of mass ,exhaust efficiency and for handling.
  • The rear radial tyre of 140/60,60% aspects ratio which enhance the better grip and handling.
  • The 7 step adjustable mono suspension which feels comfortable on any type of road.
  • Seating posture so comfortable which doesn’t feel fatigue on long ride.
  • It comes with 5 spoke alloy wheel with front 276 mm disc for great breaking.
  • The vehicle is not bad on city ride,the smoother gear shifting make us feel comfortable on city.
  • It feels smaller engine for this bike with a bigger look.
  • The bike lags in power when compared to  pulsar they could have increased the power for fazer.
  • It can mileage of 40-45 kmpl.

COMPARISON OF ADVANTAGES / MERITS:

PULSAR 150

  • Its looks good.
  • Excellent power with 14.09 bhp.
  • smooth engine.
  • Excellent breaking.
  • Digital speedometer.
  • The new city light( wolf eye) gives new stylish looks.
  • Digital twin spark ignition Engine ( DTSi).
  • New razor sharp tail light.

FAZER 150

  • Great sporty look with split head light.
  • good design with new style.
  • Good quality and reliable bike.
  • Radial tyre.

COMPARISON OF DISADVANTAGE /DEMERITS

PULSAR 150

  • The bike heavy  feels insecurity.
  • uncomfortable handling.
  • After 50000 kms pulsar asks for more maintenance.
  • Sensitive dis breaking.

FAZER 150

  • Lags in mileage.
  • Bit expensive compare to other.
  • Bit costly compare to unicorn.
COMPARISON OF MILEAGE:
PULSAR 150
Pulsar 150 cc gives 55-60 in city
FAZER 150
It gives very good mileage of 40-45kmpl.
COMPARISON OF SPECIFICATION
SPEC PULSAR FAZER
M F C BAJAJ YAMAHA
C C 149.01 CC 153
TORQUE 13.9 Nm@6500rpm 14 Nm@6000rpm
BHP 14.09 @8000rpm 14@7500rpm
GEAR 5 SPEED 5 SPEED
STARTER ELECTRIC /KICK ELECTRIC
WHEEL BASE 1320 MM 1335 MM
TYRE 100×80 (alloy wh) F 100X60 R 140/60(alloy wh)
MILEAGE 55-60 40-45
PRICE 67000 On road 80000 on road

13 Comments

  • By Jennifer Lancey, January 23, 2010 @ 4:59 am

    Hi there,

    I looked over your blog and it looks really good. Do you ever do link exchanges on your blog roll? If you do, I’d like to exchange links with you.

    Let me know if you’re interested.

    Thanks..

  • By Chevy body parts, February 10, 2010 @ 2:11 am

    BAJAJ PULSAR 150 and YAMAHA FAZER 150 both are very good and having amazing features
    thanks for sharing this information
    Thanks

    Chevy body parts

  • By vishal, December 14, 2010 @ 8:40 am

    pulsar is best….less price n best perfomance then fazer!!!!!!!!

  • By gowtham, December 15, 2010 @ 8:07 pm

    is it best to buy pulsar150 or fazer

  • By roshan andrews, February 16, 2011 @ 7:38 am

    best opinion is gooo for yaaamii FAZER ,,,looks are imported from their FZ 1000 or 600 fazer,,,yamaha engines are bulletproof,,

  • By Manoj, March 3, 2011 @ 10:25 am

    Pulsar is the best

  • By Sunny, April 26, 2011 @ 9:38 am

    Guyz never go for pulsar coz it gives a worst comfort.

    I have taken the test ride of both bikes.
    I took the test drive of pulsar 150 first.
    As i picked up the bike and as started to ride i felt very uncomfortable. I felt that if i would brake then i’ll be gone.

    And as i took the test drive of Fazer,
    it was amazing feeling of safety.
    I felt totally comfort riding with Fazer.

    Guyz if u can pay upto 70,000 to 75,000 then why don’t you pay a little bit more as 5,000 for better safe riding.

  • By Prashant Hire, June 8, 2012 @ 6:01 am

    it is pulser 150 it betar fazer 153

  • By jai, June 23, 2012 @ 11:52 pm

    pulsar will be the best choice while comparing fazer, fz and r15

  • By S.Prabhakaran.palani.ckp, July 7, 2012 @ 9:33 pm

    I like pulser .
    its look very sexy.
    dont get yamaha it is yaman…
    pulser are low price and higest mailege…

  • By Anurag, October 5, 2012 @ 8:19 pm

    Hi,

    i have both pulsar 150 as well as fazer and i must say fazer is far better than pulsar. First of all it gives mileage of 50km/l and its smother, safe and much comfortable than pulsar the only drawback is that pulsar have good pickup than fazer however on a long run fazer is more fast than pulsar and pulsar engines are not at all long life….

  • By bijoy, December 26, 2012 @ 1:05 am

    fazer is good

Other Links to this Post

  1. Major factors that our automobile insurance rates | Car Insurance Instant — January 23, 2010 @ 5:55 am

RSS feed for comments on this post. TrackBack URI

Leave a comment